Supreme Court appointments are basically the “putting” of high level Presidential politics. (In golf, you drive for show but you putt for dough.) Any president in office quickly understands that for any measure or policy he enacted during office to have any form of long term effect, you have to have judges in place to interpret those measures in your favor and produces decisions that will enforce those policies. Even though Obama may be using a very weasily form of appointment to add Judge Garland to the bench, the appointment itself will be for life and is irrevocable. This must be stopped.
Infowars.com – The prospect of multiple Supreme Court appointments looms large over the incoming Trump administration, and liberal stalwarts are urging President Barack Obama to appoint Judge Merrick Garland to the high court by an aggressive, and dubious, parliamentary maneuver.
The Constitution’s recess appointment power allows the president to make appointments to federal offices without congressional consent while Congress is in recess. The appointment is only temporary, and expires at the conclusion of the ensuing Senate session — in this case, December 2017.
To mitigate against recess appointments during adjournments, Congress typically holds “pro forma” sessions on a regular basis — the chamber is, quite literally, gaveled into and out of session in a matter of seconds, making recess appointments impossible. However, some liberal commentators argue the president has authority to make a recess appointment in a matter of seconds on Tuesday.
The 114th Congress will hold its final session on Tuesday, during which the speaker of the house will officially conclude the term’s business. At the strike of the speaker’s gavel, Congress will technically be in, if only for a moment, before the 115th Congress is called to session one minute later. It’s that brief moment, called an “inter-session recess,” that some believe presents Obama the opportunity to exercise his recess appointment power.
Image Source: s.yimg.com
